عالم‌زاده، مریم، الگوی ایده‌آل دینداری در گفتمان سنت‌گرایی معاصر (مطالعه سوری آراء و سیدحسین نصر) نامه فرهنگ و ارتباطات، شماره ۲، بهار و تابستان ۱۳۸۹٫
فرهادپور، مراد و دیگران، پلورالیزم دینی، کیان، سال پنجم، شماره۲۸، ۱۳۷۴٫
لگنهاوزن، محمد و حسین بشریه، اقتراح، سنت‌گرایی و تجدد در نظرخواهی از دانشوران، شماره ۱۷ و ۱۸، زمستان و بهار ۷۷ و ۷۸٫
لگنهاوزن، محمد، نکاتی چند پیرامون پلورالیزم دینی، آقایان سیدحسین نصر و جان‌هیک، مترجم: احمدرضا حبیبی، معرفت، شماره۲۴، بهار ۱۳۷۷٫
محمد رضایی، محمد، مبانی پلورالیزم دینی، اندیشه‌های فلسفی، سال اول، شماره اول، زمستان ۱۳۸۳٫
نصر، سیدحسین، دین، دولت، مدرنیته و مذهب، آیینه اندیشه، شماره۶، اسفند۸۶٫
هاروی، وان، هرمنوتیک و تاریخچه آن، ترجمه: مریم امینی، کیان، شماره۴۲، ۱۳۷۷٫
ج: منابع انگلیسی
Alstan, William, Religion Experience as perception of God, axford university press, Newyork, 1996.
Alston, William, Religion, in: the Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Edited by: Paul Edward, Macmillin Publishing co newyok 1998 Vol 3.
Clrak, Maudemarie, Nietzche, Freidrich, Routledge Encyelopedia of Philosophy, London Vol 7.
Editoral staff, websters Third New International Dictionary of English Language unabridged, Encyclipedia Britanica, Chicago, 1961.
Graig, Edward, Pluralism, in Routhledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Landon 1998 vo17.
Hich, John, Problem of religious pluralism, st, Martins press, 1985.
Nasr, Seyyed Hossein, Islamic life and Thought, Albany, State University press 1981.
Quinn, Philip, L, Religious Pluralism, In Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 1998, Vol 8.
Shills, Edward, Tradition, Comprative studies in Society and History, Special Issue in Tradition and Modernity, Vol 13 No. 2, 1971.
| بسمه تعالی Graduate Studies ThesisDissertation Information Ferdowsi University of Mashhad |
||||
| Title of ThesisDissertation: A comparative examination of Soroush’s Pluralism Theory and Nasrs’s Transcendental Unity of Religions Theory |
||||
| Author: Haniehsadat Seyedi Supervisor(s): Dr Jahangir Masoodi Advisor(s): Dr Alireza Kohansal |
||||
| Specialization: | Department: | Faculty: Theology and Islamic studies | ||
| Defense Date: — | Approval Date: | |||
| Number of Pages: | M. Sc. l Ph. D. ¡ | |||
| Abstract: Pluralism or religious pluralism is the most importantepistemological concern.The plurality of religions is not main issue but its reason is central concern. Religious pluralism andtranscendent unity of religions are reactions to this matter. Pluralism tries to approve truthfulness of other religions and their followers salvation. Dr. Sorushas the supporter of this idea, on the basis of kant’s epistemology and philosophical hermeneutics has claimed the followers of other religions have not received the Truth but only achieved it’s representation. According to him, kant’s epistemology includes religious experience. DrSorush claims the religious experience is primary core of all religions, but different cultures and impressionshave played their role in its interpretations and offered manifold commentaries. Dr. Nasr as a representative of traditionalism, on the basis of Genon, Schuon and Islamic Sufis believes in inward unity of religions. According to him, although the surface of religions are incompatible, their inward is one and the same. He also emphasizes on inner and eternal wisdom as common axis among all religions. And finally, he attaches to all religions divine origin. To put it in comparative perspective, we can say their similarity is belief in truthfulness of all religions and their followers salvation. But their dissimilarity has concerned with the way of this approach. Dr. Sorush has used kant’s epistemology and philosophical hermeneutics and Dr. Nasr has emphasized on traditionalism. |
||||
| Key Words: Religious epistemology, religious pluralism, Dr. Sorush, transcendent unity of religions, Dr. Nasr, eternal wisdom |
||||
